ArticleInternational journal of hematology2025
Efficacy and safety of the thiotepa-busulfan conditioning regimen as for autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory systemic diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The BEAM regimen is widely used, but the MEAM regimen is more common in Japan due to the unavailability of carmustine. This retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy of the thiotepa and busulfan (TT/BU) regimen compared with other regimens in 27 patients with systemic DLBCL who underwent ASCT at our institution from December 2013 to March 2022. Fourteen patients received the TT/BU regimen, while 13 received alternative regimens. The TT/BU regimen demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to other regimens, with a 3 year PFS of 84.4% and OS of 91.7%. The TT/BU group also had fewer severe adverse events, particularly regarding renal function. Our findings suggest that the TT/BU regimen is a well-tolerated and effective alternative for relapsed/refractory DLBCL and provide valuable insights for future treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.