Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39937322›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research2025

Quantifying chlorophylls in melanic lichens: the necessity of separating the absorbance of melanin and chlorophyll.

Knut Asbjørn Solhaug, Yngvar Gauslaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Knut Asbjørn SolhaugFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, Ås, NO-1432, Norway. knut.solhaug@nmbu.no.
Yngvar GauslaaFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, Ås, NO-1432, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates extraction and quantification techniques for chlorophylls (Chl) in melanic lichens, with an emphasis on distinguishing between Chl and melanin absorbance during spectrophotometric assessments. We compared various extraction protocols, involving solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and acetone, and methods including intact thalli extraction, mortar grinding, and ball mill pulverizing. Three correction methods for melanic absorbance were also compared. Our findings indicated that DMSO was superior for Chl extraction compared to acetone, and differences in efficiency among the DMSO methods were minor. Correction for co-extracted melanin was deemed vital for accurate Chl quantification. The use of a C18 minicolumn was found to be effective for separating Chl and melanic pigments, providing reliable measurements of total Chl and Chl a/b-ratios. This method offers a simple cost-effective approach for Chl quantification in extracts containing a mix of Chl and other red light-absorbing pigments.

Indexed as

ChlorophyllLichensMelaninsDimethyl SulfoxideSpectrophotometryChlorophyllDimethyl SulfoxideMelaninsAbsorbance correctionAcetoneBryoriaCetrariaDimethyl sulfoxide chlorophyll quantificationExtraction methodsLichensMelanin

Identifiers

PMID39937322
PMCPMC11821740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.