ArticleDiscover oncology2025
A deep learning model to predict dose distributions for breast cancer radiotherapy.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Ovarian dose prediction after ovarian transposition in cervical cancer: comparing three models and the impact of geometric distance on predictive performance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A multi-centre evaluation of deep learning based radiotherapy planning for left-sided node-negative breast cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn this work, we propose to develop a 3D U-Net-based deep learning model that accurately predicts the dose distribution for breast cancer radiotherapy.
methodsThis study included 176 breast cancer patients, divided into training, validating and testing sets. A deep learning model based on the 3D U-Net architecture was developed to predict dose distribution, which employed a double encoder combination attention (DECA) module, a cross stage partial + Resnet + Attention (CRA) module, a difficulty perception and a critical regions loss. The performance and generalization ability of this model were evaluated by the voxel mean absolute error (MAE), several clinically relevant dosimetric indexes and 3D gamma passing rates.
resultsOur model accurately predicted the 3D dose distributions with each dosage level mirroring the clinical reality in shape. The generated dose-volume histogram (DVH) matched with the ground truth curve. The total dose error of our model was below 1.16 Gy, complying with clinical usage standards. When compared to other exceptional models, our model optimally predicted eight out of nine regions, and the prediction errors for the first planning target volume (PTV1) and PTV2 were merely 1.03 Gy and 0.74 Gy. Moreover, the mean 3%/3 mm 3D gamma passing rates for PTV1, PTV2, Heart and Lung L achieved 91.8%, 96.4%, 91.5%, and 93.2%, respectively, surpassing the other models and meeting clinical standards.
conclusionsThis study developed a new deep learning model based on 3D U-Net that can accurately predict dose distributions for breast cancer radiotherapy, which can improve the quality and planning efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.