ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Clinical importance of incisional hernia in patients resected for colorectal liver metastases: quality of life and abdominal wall symptoms.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIncisional hernia (IH) after open liver surgery is a well-recognized complication. The clinical importance of IH detected on computed tomography in terms of objective abdominal wall discomfort and impairment of quality of life (QoL) is less well known.
methodsPatients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 at a single center and were alive in February 2017 were asked to complete a ventral hernia pain questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire.
resultsA total of 105 patients (80%) completed the questionnaires. Forty-three patients (42%) developed IH. The majority (77%) of IHs were < 2.5 cm. Patients who had an IH before liver surgery developed a new IH to a greater extent (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding abdominal wall symptoms and QoL between patients with and without IH. However, about half (48%) of all patients had abdominal wall symptoms after a median follow-up of 34 months.
conclusionRadiologically detected IH after open liver surgery has low clinical importance. About half of all patients who underwent liver surgery experienced abdominal wall symptoms a long after surgery, but these symptoms were not related to IH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.