ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Long-term comparative study evaluating the screw-cement construct for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty: our experience.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-based 3D planning-supported stem-free screw-cement augmentation versus 2D radiograph-planned short-stem reconstruction for AORI type I-II medial tibial defects in TKA: a two-year retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Biomechanical study on the treatment of tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty using the cement-screw and metal block with extension stem techniques: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Cement and screw reconstruction for Rand type II bone defects during total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the preferred treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, but challenges arise with severe angular deformities and associated tibial bone loss. The cement screw construct has emerged as a promising technique for managing these defects, offering advantages such as cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and ease of implementation. This research evaluated the clinical, functional and radiological outcome of screw-cement construct for the tibial defects in TKA.
methodThis retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes and success rate of the cement screw construct in patients with significant tibial defects. Sixty-five patients (104 knees) undergoing TKA were divided into two groups: conventional TKA (Group A) and TKA with screw-cement construct (Group B). Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected, with a follow-up duration of at least eight years.
resultsThe study revealed comparable demographic characteristics between groups. Both cohorts exhibited significant postoperative improvements in knee morphology and clinical outcomes. Group B demonstrated a higher incidence of radiolucency around the tibial tray, although no progressive complications were observed. Implant survival rates were similar between groups, with complications such as aseptic loosening and infections occurring in both without significant difference.
conclusionsThis study emphasised the viability of the screw-cement construct for managing uncontained tibial defects during TKA, providing evidence of its efficacy, and cost-effectiveness and suggesting its potential as a standard approach for tibial defects till 20 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39937239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.