Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39937096›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Brain areas for reversible symbolic reference, a potential singularity of the human brain.

Timo van Kerkoerle, Louise Pape, Milad Ekramnia, Xiaoxia Feng, Jordy Tasserie, Morgan Dupont, Xiaolian Li, Béchir Jarraya, Wim Vanduffel, Stanislas Dehaene and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural representation of action symbols in primate frontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cognitive Maps in the Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Timo van KerkoerleCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-8216
Louise PapeCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Milad EkramniaCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Xiaoxia FengCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Jordy TasserieCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Morgan DupontCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Xiaolian LiDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory of Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven Medical School, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3648-7554
Béchir JarrayaCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0878-763X
Wim VanduffelDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory of Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven Medical School, Leuven, Belgium.
Stanislas DehaeneCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Ghislaine Dehaene-LambertzCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif sur Yvette, France.

Funding

European Commission - Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives 695403European Commission - Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives 695710European Commission - Stichting Radboud Universiteit 101078667FWO-Flanders G0E0520NKU Leuven C14/21/111KU Leuven G0C1920N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of symbolic thinking has been proposed as a dominant cognitive criterion to distinguish humans from other primates during hominisation. Although the proper definition of a symbol has been the subject of much debate, one of its simplest features is bidirectional attachment: the content is accessible from the symbol, and vice versa. Behavioural observations scattered over the past four decades suggest that this criterion might not be met in non-human primates, as they fail to generalise an association learned in one temporal order (A to B) to the reverse order (B to A). Here, we designed an implicit fMRI test to investigate the neural mechanisms of arbitrary audio-visual and visual-visual pairing in monkeys and humans and probe their spontaneous reversibility. After learning a unidirectional association, humans showed surprise signals when this learned association was violated. Crucially, this effect occurred spontaneously in both learned and reversed directions, within an extended network of high-level brain areas, including, but also going beyond, the language network. In monkeys, by contrast, violations of association effects occurred solely in the learned direction and were largely confined to sensory areas. We propose that a human-specific brain network may have evolved the capacity for reversible symbolic reference.

Indexed as

BrainAdultAnimalsBrain MappingCognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultfMRIhumanlanguagelearningneuroscienceprimaterhesus macaquesymbol

Identifiers

PMID39937096
PMCPMC11820117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.