Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936953›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Minimal Residual Disease and Its Application in Colorectal Cancer.

Oluseyi Abidoye, Daniel H Ahn, Mitesh J Borad, Christina Wu, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Sakti Chakrabarti, Mohamad Bassam Sonbol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond the biopsy: the new era of non-invasive staging and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Practical integration of ctDNA-defined minimal residual disease in gastrointestinal cancers: testing windows and evidence-aligned management frameworks.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oluseyi AbidoyeMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5666-6085
Daniel H AhnMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Mitesh J BoradMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Christina WuMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Tanios Bekaii-SaabMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Sakti ChakrabartiUniversity Hospital Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-098X
Mohamad Bassam SonbolMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6931-242X

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a heterogeneous group of diseases that imposes a considerable global and national health burden. Although most CRC patients are diagnosed at an early stage and undergo potentially curative treatment, a significant proportion experience recurrence. Currently, adjuvant chemotherapy decisions are primarily based on clinicopathological characteristics, which have well-recognized limitations in accurately identifying patients harboring minimal residual disease (MRD), often resulting in unnecessary chemotherapy exposure. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising surrogate marker for MRD, offering a more precise approach to identifying patients at risk of recurrence after curative-intent surgery and refining adjuvant chemotherapy decisions. Growing evidence from multiple studies has demonstrated that ctDNA outperforms traditional clinicopathological factors as a marker for MRD. This review synthesizes key studies supporting the role of ctDNA in MRD detection for CRC patients and evaluates clinical trials investigating the application of ctDNA in guiding adjuvant therapy decisions. This emerging strategy holds the potential to transform the adjuvant treatment paradigm in colorectal cancer by optimizing therapeutic precision and minimizing unnecessary treatment.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm, ResidualBiomarkers, TumorHumansBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAadjuvant chemotherapycirculating tumor DNAcolon cancercolorectal cancerminimal residual disease

Identifiers

PMID39936953
PMCPMC11817155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.