ArticleCoDAS2025
Effects of the Program for Developing Oral Communication Expressiveness on university radio announcers: a pre/post intervention study.
Article in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the effects of the Program for Developing Oral Communication Expressiveness on announcers of a university radio station.
methodsThis is a pre/post intervention study. The Program for Developing Oral Communication Expressiveness was implemented with eight announcers in eight 2-hour meetings. Participants were evaluated before and after the program using self-perception instruments, auditory-perceptual judgment, and acoustic analysis of their voices during standardized readings. Statistical analysis included descriptive and statistical inference methods with a significance level of p < 0.05.
resultsThe announcers' self-perceived diction and voice improved after the program. Half of the pairs evaluated improved in the auditory-perceptual judgment of reading, emphasizing voice quality, speech, and interpretation. The acoustic analysis found reduced fundamental frequency of speech, increased articulation and elocution rate, and decreased speech intensity.
conclusionThe program considerably improved aspects of the announcers' voice and speech, highlighting the importance of specific training programs to improve radio communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.