ArticleCoDAS2025
Performance of swallowing function between older people with and without clinical complaints.
Article in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the findings of speech-language-hearing evaluations, signs in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, and nutritional risk between healthy older adults with and without self-reported swallowing difficulties and correlate the level of oral intake with the severity of pharyngeal residues and nutritional risk.
methodsThis cross-sectional retrospective study included 71 older people and divided them into two groups based on the presence of swallowing complaints. Data were collected from speech-language-hearing evaluations, oral health status, and videoendoscopy signs with four food consistencies classified by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) to compare the groups. Pharyngeal residues were analyzed and classified using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), the level of oral intake was assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and nutritional risk was evaluated using the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST).
resultsDifferences were found in speech-language-hearing evaluations, as well as signs of posterior oral spillage and pharyngeal residues with levels 0, 2, and 4 consistencies and laryngeal penetration with level 0 consistency. The level of oral intake was moderately negatively correlated with the severity of pharyngeal residues and nutritional risk.
conclusionThe group of older adults with complaints had differences in speech-language-hearing evaluations, posterior oral spillage, and pharyngeal residues with levels 0, 2, and 4 consistencies, and laryngeal penetration with level 0 consistency. The correlation indicated that the lower the level of oral intake, the greater the severity of pharyngeal residues and nutritional risk in the sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.