ArticleCoDAS2025
Presentation of an Auditory Training Protocol Applied in Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder.
Article in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo present an auditory training protocol in children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD).
methodsThe study included nine children aged from 9 to 12, with five females and four males. Only children with auditory thresholds within the normal range and bilateral type A tympanometric curves were selected. Initially, a behavioral assessment of Central Auditory Processing (CAP) was conducted, and a self-perception questionnaire was administered. Subsequently, eight sessions of auditory training were conducted following a defined protocol with four specific activities per session, aimed at training distinct auditory skills. In a third phase, a new CAP behavioral assessment was carried out, and the questionnaire was reapplied.
resultsThe quantitative analysis of the pre- and post-training behavioral tests showed statistically significant improvements in the Left Dichotic Digit Test (DDT), the Left Competing Dissyllable Test (SSW), the Left Synthetic Sentence Identification with Ipsilateral Competing Message Test (SSI), and the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT). An improvement in auditory behavioral perception of the participants was also observed, as indicated by the self-perception questionnaire responses.
conclusionAlthough the auditory training protocol did not result in complete normalization in the Central Auditory Processing (CAP) Behavioral Assessment tests, an improvement in the auditory skills of binaural integration, figure-ground and temporal resolution of participants was observed, as well as in their personal perception of these abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.