ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Child and adolescent mental health: analysis of therapeutic itineraries in an inner municipality without Child and Adolescent Psychosocial Care Centers].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on therapeutic itineraries in child and adolescent mental health has been predominantly carried out in Child and Adolescent Psychosocial Care Centers or in regions that have these services. To expand the understanding of this field, this study analyzed the therapeutic itineraries of children and adolescents assisted by the Multiprofessional Mental Health Team service - locally known as "Mental Health" - in an inner municipality without Child and Adolescent Psychosocial Care Centers. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 mothers and two fathers to understand their motivations for seeking care, the places they visited, and the experiences they had in this process. The data were analyzed by descending hierarchical classification, made possible by IRaMuTeQ. In total, four categories were formed: (1) initial detection of needs, (2) motivations for seeking care, (3) service dynamics, and (4) factors that affect continuity of care. Schools prevailed as the drivers of the search for care, whereas basic health units acted more as referral points for specialists. Psychologists and psychiatrists from the Multiprofessional Mental Health Team, speech therapists from the Polyclinic, and neurologists from the private network and the Regional Center of Specialties were the specialties that received the most visits. Participants deemed the high turnover of professionals as the main barrier to access and continuity of care. Unlike other studies - which have been developed in contexts with more comprehensive service networks -, which often suggest strengthening the existing child and adolescent mental health networks, this study highlights the need to build such networks from the ground up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.