Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936726›Full record

GuidelineJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2025

Joint statement on evidence-based practices in mechanical ventilation: suggestions from two Brazilian medical societies.

Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Arthur Oswaldo de Abreu Vianna, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Israel Silva Maia, Sérgio Vasconcellos Baldisserotto, Alexandre Marini Isola, Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia and the Mechanical Ventilation Practical Suggestions and Considerations Working Group

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Evidence, implementation, and challenges in mechanical ventilation.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juliana Carvalho Ferreira. Division of Pulmonology, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6548-1384
Arthur Oswaldo de Abreu Vianna. Clínica São Vicente, Rede D'Or São Luiz - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1012-4776
Bruno Valle Pinheiro. Hospital Universitário, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-3533
Israel Silva Maia. Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Florianópolis (SC), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3467-5287
Sérgio Vasconcellos Baldisserotto. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1014-7851
Alexandre Marini Isola. Department of Continuing Education, Imed Group - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4143-0274
Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia and the Mechanical Ventilation Practical Suggestions and Considerations Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving intervention, but its implementation requires a multidisciplinary approach, with an understanding of its indications and contraindications due to the potential for complications. The management of mechanical ventilation should be part of the curricula during clinical training; however, trainees and practicing professionals frequently report low confidence in managing mechanical ventilation, often seeking additional sources of knowledge. Review articles, consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines have become important sources of guidance in mechanical ventilation, and although clinical practice guidelines offer rigorously developed recommendations, they take a long time to develop and can address only a limited number of clinical questions. The Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira and the Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia sponsored the development of a joint statement addressing all aspects of mechanical ventilation, which was divided into 38 topics. Seventy-five experts from all regions of Brazil worked in pairs to perform scoping reviews, searching for publications on their specific topic of mechanical ventilation in the last 20 years in the highest impact factor journals in the areas of intensive care, pulmonology, and anesthesiology. Each pair produced suggestions and considerations on their topics, which were presented to the entire group in a plenary session for modification when necessary and approval. The result was a comprehensive document encompassing all aspects of mechanical ventilation to provide guidance at the bedside. In this article, we report the methodology used to produce the document and highlight the most important suggestions and considerations of the document, which has been made available to the public in Portuguese.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeRespiration, ArtificialBrazilEvidence-Based MedicineHumansSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID39936726
PMCPMC11796564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.