Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936717›Full record

ArticleBrazilian oral research2025

Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK as a framework material for single implant-retained mandibular overdentures.

Guilherme Almeida Borges, Marcelo Ferraz Mesquita, Luana Figueiredo da Silva Matias, Thaís Barbin, Leonardo Mendes Ribeiro Machado, Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guilherme Almeida BorgesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9834
Marcelo Ferraz MesquitaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-6628
Luana Figueiredo da Silva MatiasUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-4598
Thaís BarbinUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5113-7312
Leonardo Mendes Ribeiro MachadoRenato Archer Center for Information Technology, Division of Technologies for Production and Health at the Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-9471
Valentim Adelino Ricardo BarãoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-9917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the biomechanical behavior of reinforcement materials [cobalt chromium alloy (CoCr) and carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone (CFR-PEEK)] and their extensions (short: 15 mm and long: 25 mm) of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures (MO-1) by 3D finite element analysis (FEA), comparing them with MO-1 without a framework. Five models (CoCr-Short, CFR-PEEK-Short, CoCr-Long, CFR-PEEK-Long, and no framework) were created using the McNeel Rhinoceros 3D software, version 7.0. Stress distribution analysis by FEA was performed using the Optstruct solver, and a 30° oblique load (100 N) was applied in the anterior region (50 N on each central incisor). Biomechanical behavior was analyzed by overdenture displacement, maximum (MaxP) and minimum principal (MinP) stress, and von Mises stress. The MO-1 model 'without a framework' produced the largest dislocation, MinP stress on the mucosa, and MaxP stress in the cortical bone. Regardless of the extension of the framework, CFR-PEEK had minor MinP stress in the mucosa and lower overdenture displacement. The 'CoCr-Long' and 'CFR-PEEK-Long' models had higher von Mises stress on the implant housing, and MaxP stress on the O'ring nylon conventional implant and overdenture. The 'CoCr-Short' and ' CFR-PEEK-Short' models showed a greater tendency for tension concentration solely in the framework. The incorporation of a framework into MO-1 decreased stress concentration on the overdenture, resulting in lower stress on the attachment, mucosa, implant, and peri-implant bone, irrespective of the material used. The short framework, however, performed better biomechanically in MO-1, and it is therefore the most recommended option. CFR-PEEK showed favorable biomechanical outcomes, and is suggested for reinforcement of MO-1.

Indexed as

CarbonChromium AlloysDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, OverlayKetonesPolyethylene GlycolsBenzophenonesBiomechanical PhenomenaCarbon FiberDental Stress AnalysisFinite Element AnalysisHumansMandibleMaterials TestingPolymersReproducibility of ResultsBenzophenonesCarbonCarbon FiberChromium AlloysKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID39936717
PMCPMC11808703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.