SynthesisActa dermato-venereologica2025
Safety of Dupilumab Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Characterization and Outcomes of Dupilumab for Pemphigoid Gestationis: A Case Series of Five Patients and Literature Review.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Review
- Reported Pregnancy Outcomes after Biologic Therapy Exposure in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review of Published Cases.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Review
- Rapid Improvement of Acute Eczematous Facial Dermatitis During Pregnancy Following Stapokibart Therapy: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Polymorphic eruption of pregnancy successfully treated with dupilumab in the postpartum period: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2026Article
- Anti-Inflammatory Therapies for Atopic Dermatitis: A New Era in Targeted Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common skin condition among pregnant women. However, there is limited information on the safety of biologicals during pregnancy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the effects of exposure to biologicals during pregnancy and/or preconception in women with AD, and to estimate the pooled prevalence of spontaneous abortions and congenital malformations in their newborns. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science to 31 May 2024 were searched to identify randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. To test the robustness of our findings, sensitivity analyses were performed. Fifteen observational studies involving 115 pregnant women with a mean age of 33.46 years (standard deviation [SD] 3.02 were included). All studies evaluated dupilumab. The mean duration of exposure to dupilumab during pregnancy was 27.52 weeks (SD 11.16). The weighted prevalence of spontaneous abortions was 18.9% (95% confidence interval 5.3 to 38.2). There were no reports of congenital malformations. The sensitivity analyses showed no significant differences in weighted prevalences. In conclusion, the current scientific evidence suggests that dupilumab is probably safe during pregnancy and preconception in women with AD, with no significant increase in the risk of miscarriage or congenital malformations compared to the general population. However, the results of this review are inconclusive due to the limited number of large, well-designed clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.