Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936574›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Statutory Duty of Candour in Victorian Health Services: Study Protocol.

Reema Harrison, Corey Adams, Nabila Binte Haque, Jennifer Morris, Liat Watson, Kristiina Siiankoski, Ashfaq Chauhan, Thrivedi Sesha Sai Danthakani, Sarah Ameen, Peter Hibbert and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Reema HarrisonAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Corey AdamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9263-8658
Nabila Binte HaqueAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer MorrisSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Liat WatsonSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kristiina SiiankoskiSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ashfaq ChauhanAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-510X
Thrivedi Sesha Sai DanthakaniAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah AmeenAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter HibbertAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7865-343X
Elizabeth ManiasSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Frankson, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-0087
Nicole YoungsSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lanii BirksSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ramesh WalpolaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah FischerSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

This study was supported by Safer Care Victoria.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA statutory duty of candour (SDC) was introduced in 2022 in the Australian state of Victoria to increase openness and honesty with patients and families about healthcare adverse events. SDC requires each healthcare service entity by law to provide the patient or their family or carer who experiences an adverse event with; a written account of the facts, an apology, a description of the health service's response to the event, and the steps being taken to prevent reoccurrence. This research aims to evaluate the impacts of SDC in the 2 years since its implementation.

designA mixed-methods sequential design will be employed, comprising a document literature review, document analysis, survey and interview data from patients, families and health service staff between 2024 and 2026. DISCUSSION: By conducting an evaluation of the impacts of SDC within 2 years of its implementation in Victorian health settings, this research will provide the first independent evidence of how the SDC is being used and affecting healthcare experiences. This research will use evaluation criteria from the UK's Duty of Candour review to gather data that can be compared with UK findings and the disclosure experiences of patients in New South Wales, Australia. Our findings will provide a vital contribution to the sparse evidence base about the SDC and its application in healthcare settings internationally. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Three members of the public (JM, LW and KS) were involved in the design of the research proposal, reviewing and contributing to the ethics protocol, the protocol paper as authors and the protocol for the systematic review that has been developed as a basis for this research. These collaborators will contribute to be involved in all aspects of the research as part of the project team.

Indexed as

Medical ErrorsHumansResearch DesignVictoriaadverse eventapologyincident disclosurepatient safetystatutory duty of candour

Identifiers

PMID39936574
PMCPMC11815560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.