ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Simulated exposures of oritavancin in in vitro pharmacodynamic models select for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to oritavancin but minimal cross-resistance or seesaw effect with other antimicrobials.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Could oritavancin be a promising alternative treatment for staphylococcal bone and joint infections? Insights from the determination of oritavancin minimum inhibitory concentrations in a collection of clinical isolates from the French National reference centre for staphylococci.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDalbavancin exposures select for VAN and daptomycin cross-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus often by walK-related mutations. Oritavancin is another long-acting lipoglycopeptide, but its proclivity to select for cross-resistance is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine if post-distributional pharmacokinetic oritavancin exposures select for meaningful susceptibility changes in S. aureus.
methodsWe simulated average post-distributional, free-drug exposures of oritavancin 1200 mg IV once (fCmax 11.2 µg/mL; β-elimination t1/2 13.4 h; γ-elimination t1/2 245 h) in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model for 28 days against five S. aureus including four MRSA. Samples were taken daily for colony enumeration and resistance screening. Susceptibility testing was repeated on isolates from resistance screening plates against oritavancin, vancomycin, daptomycin, dalbavancin and 6 beta-lactams with varying penicillin-binding protein affinities.
resultsTested oritavancin exposures were bactericidal against 5/5 strains for 2-17 days before regrowth of less-susceptible subpopulations occurred. Isolates with reduced susceptibility to oritavancin were detected as early as 5 days, but the MIC increased above the susceptibility breakpoint (>0.125 mg/L) in 4/5 strains eventually. Vancomycin and daptomycin MICs increased by 2- to 8-fold but did not exceed the susceptibility breakpoints in most isolates. β-lactam MICs were largely unchanged among the recovered isolates with reduced oritavancin susceptibility. Mutations were diverse but often involved purR with 13 unique variants identified among 4/5 strains.
conclusionsOritavancin-selected resistance was primarily associated with purR mutation and less frequently associated with cross-resistance and walK mutation than dalbavancin-selected resistance in similar strains and conditions. The reason for this is unclear but may stem from differences in the mechanism(s) and divergent mutational pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.