ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2025
Population Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine in Infants with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Phase I, Dose-Escalating Trial.
Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Editorial: Evaluating efficacy and outcomes in neonatal HIE treatment: A global perspective.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- From Fragmented Data to Integrated Drug Development in Asphyxiated Neonates Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mainstay of treatment for infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is cooling. Caffeine may be an important adjunct to cooling and provide neuroprotection via its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties. This study aimed to characterize caffeine pharmacokinetics in term infants with HIE receiving cooling. In this phase 1, dose-escalating study, enrolled infants received IV caffeine 20 mg/kg followed by up to two daily doses of 5 or 10 mg/kg. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM (v7.5). The effects of clinical covariates, including cooling, on pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated. Dosing simulations were performed to evaluate the percentage of plasma exposures in the reference range (15-25 mg/L). Seventeen infants were included in model development. A one-compartment model best fit the data. Population clearance was 0.445 L/h/70 kg and volume of distribution was 87.1 L/70 kg. Current dosing regimens (20 mg/kg followed by 5 mg/kg) resulted in 89.5% of infants having at least one simulated exposure below the reference range across the dosing interval. Dosing regimens of 30 mg/kg followed by 5 or 10 mg/kg were predicted to result in more than half of infants achieving simulated exposures in the reference range, with ≤2% of infants having simulated exposures in the toxic range (>46 mg/L). Term infants with HIE had similar weight-normalized clearance but higher weight-normalized volume of distribution compared to prior studies in preterm infants without HIE or cooling. While exposure targets for neuroprotection in HIE are unknown, this phase 1 study suggests alternate dosing strategies should be considered in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.