ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Decoding Parametric Grip-Force Anticipation From fMRI Data.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Graded Grip-Force Intensity From fMRI Data Reveals a Transformation From Abstract to Effector- and Movement-Specific Codes Prior to Execution.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Role of the left intraparietal sulcus in the comprehension of action intensity described in sentences.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Decoding Effector-Specific Parametric Grip-Force Anticipation From fMRI-Data.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Divergent Neural Mechanisms of Self-Concerned and Prosocial Decision-Making Under High and Low Cognitive Loads.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Effector-dependent neural representations of perceptual decisions independent of motor actions and sensory modalities.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that activity in premotor and parietal brain-regions covaries with the intensity of upcoming grip-force. However, it remains unclear how information about the intended grip-force intensity is initially represented and subsequently transformed into a motor code before motor execution. In this fMRI study, we used multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to decode where and when information about grip-force intensities is parametrically coded in the brain. Human participants performed a delayed grip-force task in which one of four cued levels of grip-force intensity had to be maintained in working memory (WM) during a 9-s delay-period preceding motor execution. Using time-resolved MVPA with a searchlight approach and support vector regression, we tested which brain regions exhibit multivariate WM codes of anticipated grip-force intensities. During the early delay period, we observed above-chance decoding in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). During the late delay period, we found a network of action-specific brain regions, including the bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS), left dorsal premotor cortex (l-PMd), and supplementary motor areas. Additionally, cross-regression decoding was employed to test for temporal generalization of activation patterns between early and late delay periods with those during cue presentation and motor execution. Cross-regression decoding indicated temporal generalization to the cue period in the vmPFC and to motor-execution in the l-IPS and l-PMd. Together, these findings suggest that the WM representation of grip-force intensities undergoes a transformation where the vmPFC encodes information about the intended grip-force, which is subsequently converted into a motor code in the l-IPS and l-PMd before execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.