Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936306›Full record

ReviewMuscle & nerve2025

Electrodiagnostic Assessment of Peri-Procedural Iatrogenic Peripheral Nerve Injuries and Rehabilitation.

Geoffrey K Seidel, Amber R Vocelle, Ian S Ackers, Kenneth A Scott, Curtis A Carl, Barent A G Bradt, Daniel Dumitru, Michael T Andary

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Geoffrey K SeidelDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Amber R VocelleDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Ian S AckersDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Kenneth A ScottDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Curtis A CarlDepartment of Anesthesiology, Valley Health System, Winchester Medical Center, Winchester, Virginia, USA.
Barent A G BradtDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Daniel DumitruDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Michael T AndaryDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iatrogenic nerve injuries are a significant concern for medical professionals and the patients affected. Peri-procedural nerve injuries result in functional deficits associated with pain and disability. The exact pathophysiology and etiology of peri-procedural nerve injuries are complex and often elude providers. The rates of injury to specific nerves are unclear and relate to both procedural and patient specific risk factors. Initial classification of the nerve injury into neurapraxia, axonotmesis, mixed nerve injury, or possible complete transection (neurotmesis) guides rehabilitation and management. Electrodiagnostic medical consultation at least four weeks post-injury, supplemented with nerve imaging (ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging), can allow for accurate nerve injury classification. Supplemented with nerve imaging and detailed clinical evaluation, treatment, recovery and rehabilitation can be maximized. Recognizing nerves at risk associated with medical and surgical procedures can facilitate injury avoidance and early diagnosis. If a nerve injury is incomplete, in an optimized physiologic milieu (good glucose control, smoking cessation, etc.), there is a good potential for spontaneous (total or partial) improvement over time. Surgical referral should be considered for severe nerve injuries within 6 months, especially if there is concern for neurotmesis, and/or deteriorating nerve function. This review gives guidance for approaching peri-procedural peripheral nerve injuries, including the timing and the role of electrodiagnostic medical consultation including serial electrodiagnostic studies in management and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

ElectrodiagnosisIatrogenic DiseasePeripheral Nerve InjuriesHumanselectrodiagnosiselectromyogramiatrogenic peripheral nerve injurynerve rehabilitationperioperative peripheral nerve injury

Identifiers

PMID39936306
PMCPMC11998969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.