ReviewBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2025
Promoting Resiliency to Stress in the Vascular Endothelium.
Review in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stroke neurovascular responses to exercise: A novel rehabilitation paradigm.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- From Molecules to Meaning: Integrating Neuropeptides, Sociostasis, and Hormesis in the Brain-Heart Axis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Occupational stress, cardiovascular vulnerability and sudden cardiac death in police officers: mechanisms and the protective role of structured exercise.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Acute Myocardial Infarction and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease in a Patient with Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
By 2050, roughly 60% of the population will have cardiovascular disease. While a substantial amount of data has been generated over the last few decades that has aided in our understanding of cardiovascular disease pathology, less is known about how to increase resiliency to cardiovascular risk factors that individuals are exposed to on a daily basis. The vascular endothelium is considered the first line of defence against circulating noxious stimuli and, when dysfunctional, is an early risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. A vast amount of data has been generated demonstrating how external stress impairs the vascular endothelium; however, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding how to amplify protective pathways and ward off stress and the development of disease, which is the focus of this review. Targeting known protective endothelial pathways may be feasible to increase resiliency to vascular stress. Leveraging stress to boost defence mechanisms within the vascular endothelium is also proposed and may help identify novel therapeutic targets to protect individuals from the stress of everyday life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.