Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936255›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

Measuring osteotomy wedge angle is more important than measuring wedge height in open wedge osteotomies around the knee in preoperative planning.

Julius Watrinet, Johannes Schlaich, Romed Vieider, Marco-Christopher Rupp, Julian Mehl, Sebastian Siebenlist, Armin Runer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A simple planning tool for tibial slope osteotomy-Osteotomy depth is a precise parameter to determine wedge height.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  4. Mid-term survival and physiological joint angles after double level osteotomy of severe varus osteoarthritis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julius WatrinetDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-4142
Johannes SchlaichDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Romed VieiderDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marco-Christopher RuppDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julian MehlDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian SiebenlistDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Armin RunerDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreoperative planning for medial open wedge high tibial osteotomies (HTOs) and lateral open wedge distal femur osteotomies (DFOs) commonly uses wedge height to guide accurate correction. However, it is unclear if this parameter is influenced by intraoperative variations in osteotomy entry point or length. This study hypothesized that wedge angle remains constant during planning, while wedge height varies depending on hinge or entry points.

methodsWhole leg radiographs of 40 patients who underwent HTO or DFO (2018-2024) were analysed using digital planning software. For each HTO and DFO case, 27 and 21 osteotomy variants were created, respectively, by altering entry and hinge points, resulting in 960 simulations. Wedge angle, wedge height and osteotomy depth were measured for each variant. Correlations and regression analyses assessed the relationships among these variables, and a mathematical formula was developed to predict wedge height from wedge angle and osteotomy depth.

resultsWedge angle remained consistent across variants (mean deviation: 0.1 ± 0.1°), while wedge height showed variability (mean deviation: 0.7 ± 0.5 mm) influenced by entry and hinge points. Significant correlations were found between wedge height and opening angle (R = 0.83, p < 0.001) and osteotomy depth (R = 0.60, p < 0.001). Predicted wedge height closely matched actual values (R = 0.998, p < 0.001), with minimal error (-0.01 ± 0.1°).

conclusionThis study highlights that relying solely on wedge height for osteotomy planning in HTO and DFO is insufficient due to variations in entry and hinge points. The hinge angle proved to be the most reliable parameter. Intraoperative osteotomy depth measurements can help adjust wedge height for accurate limb alignment when deviations occur. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, simulation study.

Indexed as

FemurKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteotomyTibiaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRadiographyRetrospective StudiesaccuracyDFOhinge pointHTOosteotomyplanning

Identifiers

PMID39936255
PMCPMC11948162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.