ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025
Understanding the Lived Experience After Colectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Patients' Voice inOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The Patients' Voice inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on quality of life in patients with chronic pouchitis: a post hoc analysis of the MicroPouch trial.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The patient experience after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) remains poorly defined, resulting in heterogeneity in clinical assessments and research. We performed a qualitative study to better understand the experience of patients after IPAA for UC, with a focus on the symptoms experienced by patients and the resultant effects on quality of life (QoL). Methods: We conducted semi-structured focus groups among patients who had undergone IPAA for UC. We invited patients with a variety of pouch-related conditions, including patients reporting normal pouch function and those with diagnosed inflammatory conditions of the pouch. We included questions on patients' experiences and symptoms after IPAA based on 4 thematic areas identified by a previously performed systematic review: bowel symptoms, activities, general issues and quality of life, and psychosocial. Results: We interviewed 15 individuals over the course of 4 focus groups. Participants described the significant impact that bowel symptoms after IPAA had on other activities including work and daily life, and their subsequent relation to QoL themes. Participants noted symptoms of frequency, urgency, and incontinence after IPAA, and many shared how these symptoms required them to change their lifestyle, particularly by altering their daily schedule or changing their diet. Nevertheless, most participants reported QoL improvement after IPAA. Conclusions: In this qualitative study evaluating the experience of patients after IPAA, multiple bowel-related symptoms impact other areas of life and overall QoL. Patients undergoing IPAA for UC represent a unique patient population, and thus patient-centered outcome measures should be designed to standardize their assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.