Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936138›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025

Understanding the Lived Experience After Colectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Qualitative Study.

Edward L Barnes, Marcella H Boynton, Darren A DeWalt, Erica Brenner, Hans H Herfarth, Michael D Kappelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Patients' Voice inOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  2. The Patients' Voice inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edward L BarnesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9894-8796
Marcella H BoyntonDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Darren A DeWaltDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Erica BrennerMultidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hans H HerfarthDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-823X
Michael D KappelmanMultidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
Treatment Approaches and Outcomes in Pouch-related Disorders after Colectomy for Ulcerative ColitisK23DK127157 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BARNES, EDWARD · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK127157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The patient experience after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) remains poorly defined, resulting in heterogeneity in clinical assessments and research. We performed a qualitative study to better understand the experience of patients after IPAA for UC, with a focus on the symptoms experienced by patients and the resultant effects on quality of life (QoL). Methods: We conducted semi-structured focus groups among patients who had undergone IPAA for UC. We invited patients with a variety of pouch-related conditions, including patients reporting normal pouch function and those with diagnosed inflammatory conditions of the pouch. We included questions on patients' experiences and symptoms after IPAA based on 4 thematic areas identified by a previously performed systematic review: bowel symptoms, activities, general issues and quality of life, and psychosocial. Results: We interviewed 15 individuals over the course of 4 focus groups. Participants described the significant impact that bowel symptoms after IPAA had on other activities including work and daily life, and their subsequent relation to QoL themes. Participants noted symptoms of frequency, urgency, and incontinence after IPAA, and many shared how these symptoms required them to change their lifestyle, particularly by altering their daily schedule or changing their diet. Nevertheless, most participants reported QoL improvement after IPAA. Conclusions: In this qualitative study evaluating the experience of patients after IPAA, multiple bowel-related symptoms impact other areas of life and overall QoL. Patients undergoing IPAA for UC represent a unique patient population, and thus patient-centered outcome measures should be designed to standardize their assessment.

Indexed as

J-pouchpatient reported outcome measurespouchitisquality of life

Identifiers

PMID39936138
PMCPMC11811768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.