Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936108›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2024

Socially interactive industrial robots: a PAD model of flow for emotional co-regulation.

Fabrizio Nunnari, Dimitra Tsovaltzi, Matteo Lavit Nicora, Sebastian Beyrodt, Pooja Prajod, Lara Chehayeb, Ingrid Brdar, Antonella Delle Fave, Luca Negri, Elisabeth André and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fabrizio Nunnari *Affecting Computing Group, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Dimitra Tsovaltzi *Affecting Computing Group, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Matteo Lavit Nicora *Industrial Engineering Department, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sebastian BeyrodtAffecting Computing Group, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Pooja PrajodHuman-Centered Artificial Intelligence, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Lara ChehayebAffecting Computing Group, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Ingrid BrdarDepartment of Psychology, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Antonella Delle FaveDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Luca NegriDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Elisabeth AndréHuman-Centered Artificial Intelligence, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Patrick GebhardAffecting Computing Group, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Matteo MalosioSTIIMA, National Research Council of Italy, Lecco, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents the development of a socially interactive industrial robot. An Avatar is used to embody a cobot for collaborative industrial assembly tasks. The embodied covatar (cobot plus its avatar) is introduced to support Flow experiences through co-regulation, interactive emotion regulation guidance. A real-time continuous emotional modeling method and an aligned transparent behavioral model, BASSF (Boredom, Anxiety, Self-efficacy, Self-compassion, Flow) is developed. The BASSF model anticipates and co-regulates counterproductive emotional experiences of operators working under stress with cobots on tedious industrial tasks. The targeted Flow experience is represented in the three-dimensional Pleasure, Arousal, and Dominance (PAD) space. We present how, despite their noisy nature, PAD signals can be used to drive the BASSF model with its theory-based interventions. The empirical results and analysis provides empirical support for the theoretically defined model, and clearly points to the need for data pre-filtering and per-user calibration. The proposed post-processing method helps quantify the parameters needed to control the frequency of intervention of the agent; still leaving the experimenter with a run-time adjustable global control of its sensitivity. A controlled empirical study (Study 1, N = 20), tested the model's main theoretical assumptions about Flow, Dominance, Self-Efficacy, and boredom, to legitimate its implementation in this context. Participants worked on a task for an hour, assembling pieces in collaboration with the covatar. After the task, participants completed questionnaires on Flow, their affective experience, and Self-Efficacy, and they were interviewed to understand their emotions and regulation during the task. The results from Study 1 suggest that the Dominance dimension plays a vital role in task-related settings as it predicts the participants' Self-Efficacy and Flow. However, the relationship between Flow, pleasure, and arousal requires further investigation. Qualitative interview analysis revealed that participants regulated negative emotions, like boredom, also without support, but some strategies could negatively impact wellbeing and productivity, which aligns with theory. Additional results from a first evaluation of the overall system (Study 2, N = 12) align with these findings and provide support for the use of socially interactive industrial robots to support wellbeing, job satisfaction, and involvement, while reducing unproductive emotional experiences and their regulation.

Indexed as

affective computingaffect modelingarousalemotion (Co-)Regulationhuman-robot interactionpleasuresocially interactive agentssocial signals

Identifiers

PMID39936108
PMCPMC11811909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.