Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936068›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of ophthalmology

Strategic Management of Descemet's Membrane Perforation During DALK in Advanced Keratoconus.

Alina Gabriela Gheorghe, Ancuța Georgiana Onofrei, Ana-Maria Arghirescu, Andrei Coleașă, Georgia-Denisa Tiran, Laura Ioana Dinu, Elena Veronica Toader

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alina Gabriela Gheorghe"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Ancuța Georgiana Onofrei"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Ana-Maria Arghirescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Andrei ColeașăDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clinical Hospital for Ophthalmological Emergencies Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Georgia-Denisa TiranDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clinical Hospital for Ophthalmological Emergencies Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Laura Ioana DinuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clinical Hospital for Ophthalmological Emergencies Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Elena Veronica ToaderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clinical Hospital for Ophthalmological Emergencies Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To report on the surgical treatment of advanced keratoconus (KC) with stromal scarring in a young male patient with asymmetric disease progression complicated by an intraoperative microperforation of Descemet's membrane (DM) during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Methods: The surgical approach consisted of manual descemetic DALK (dDALK), further complicated with DM microperforation. Anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (AS-OCT) was used intraoperatively to locate the site and size of the tear. The surgeon decided not to convert to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), despite stromal scarring, significant ectasia, and variable corneal thickness, but rather to continue the dissection of the stromal bed with maximum precaution. Results: Postoperatively, visual results improved and reached the best corrected visual acuity of 20/20. Choosing a proper graft dimension and reaching anatomical separation up to the DM were the keys to obtaining such a positive refractive outcome. Discussions: DALK, the most advanced treatment for KC, was chosen as the ideal option for this young patient due to its advantages over PK: reduced rejection risk, fewer complications, quicker steroid tapering, and faster recovery. However, its steep learning curve remains a challenge for surgeons. Conclusions: Despite manual DALK being a more challenging and time-consuming procedure than PK, careful dissection of the stromal bed and diligent assessment of the affected DM can provide a better and safer outcome for selected patients. Even if initial postoperative visual results are impressive, the surgeon must pay attention to the patient's future check-ups to swiftly correct any possible complications.

Indexed as

Corneal PerforationCorneal TransplantationDescemet MembraneIntraoperative ComplicationsKeratoconusVisual AcuityAdolescentCorneal TopographyHumansMaleTomography, Optical CoherenceAC =Anterior ChamberAI =Artificial intelligenceAS-OCT = Anterior segment ocular coherence tomographyBB = Big BubbleCAIRS = Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring SegmentsCXL = Corneal Cross-LinkingDALK = Deep anterior lamellar keratoplastydDALK = descemetic DALKDeep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK)Deg = DegreeDL = Dua’s layerDM = Descemet’s membraneDMEK = Descemet Membrane Endothelial KeratoplastyICRS = Intracorneal Stromal Ring SegmentIntraoperative Anterior Segment OCTIOP = Intraocular PressureKCE = Keratoconus enlargementKC = KeratoconusKeratoconus (KC)K-Max = Maximum Keratometryoutcomes of Anterior Lamellar KeratoplastyPK = Penetrating keratoplastypostoperative management of Anterior Lamellar Keratoplastyrecovery techniques in DALKRGP = Rigid Gas Permeable Lenses

Identifiers

PMID39936068
PMCPMC11809823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.