Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39936057›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of ophthalmology

A case series on minor incision cataract surgery in small pupil without any aids.

Mary Stephen, Nirupama Kasturi, Jayasri Periyandavan, Arun Sahi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary StephenDepartment of Ophthalmology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Nirupama KasturiDepartment of Ophthalmology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Jayasri PeriyandavanDepartment of Ophthalmology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Arun SahiDepartment of Ophthalmology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cataract is the leading cause of treatable blindness worldwide, and cataract surgery complications leading to blindness are a common cause of preventable blindness. All surgeons aim to obtain a good pupil dilation intra-operatively to ease the surgery. The small pupil is often challenging and contributes to intra and post-operative complications. Phacoemulsification, though, has many options to tackle small pupil. The same options cannot be employed in small incision cataract surgery, especially using mechanical pupil expanders. Small incision cataract surgery is very commonly performed in developing countries. The authors describe a case series of small pupil cataracts managed successfully without the use of any secondary aids to cause pupil dilatation and explain the techniques employed to manage small pupil while performing Small incision cataract surgery. With correct techniques, operative complications of small pupil can be minimized, and small incision cataract surgery is still a helpful option, especially in resource-limited settings, to provide an excellent visual recovery.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionMiosisPhacoemulsificationPupilVisual AcuityHumansblindnessphacoemulsificationpupil expanderssmall incision cataract surgerysmall pupil

Identifiers

PMID39936057
PMCPMC11809824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.