Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935965›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2024

Romy M Mayer, Andrea Gubler, Thomas Attin, Matthias Zehnder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Romy M MayerClinic for Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Zurich Center for Dental Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea GublerClinic for Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Zurich Center for Dental Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas AttinClinic for Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Zurich Center for Dental Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias ZehnderClinic for Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Zurich Center for Dental Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Traditionally, internal tooth bleaching was performed using sodium perborate slurries. These are banned in some areas for potential carcinogenic effects. More recently, highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide gels have been used, which may cause dentin degradation. Consequently, the search for ideal internal tooth bleaching agents is still on. This study compared pure ROS-releasing granules regarding their liberation of oxidizing species, pH induction, bleaching of blood-stained dentin, and effects on mechanical dentin properties. Materials and methods: The ROS-releasing granules under investigation were sodium perborate, carbamide peroxide, and sodium percarbonate in aqueous suspension (4:3, wt/wt). The bleaching efficacy of these suspensions was compared in blood-stained human dentin ( Results: Granules release between 21.5% and 35.2% (wt/wt) of H Conclusions: Sodium perborate granules in aqueous suspension combined good de-staining properties with limited untoward effects on dentin integrity. Further studies are required to identify alternative compounds with a lesser general health concern.

Indexed as

bleachingcarbamide peroxidedentalhydrogen peroxidesodium perboratesodium percarbonate

Identifiers

PMID39935965
PMCPMC11811772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.