Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935948›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Differences in carbon and nitrogen metabolism of soft japonica rice in southern China during grain filling stage under different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions and their relationship with rice eating quality.

Zhongtao Ma, Jiale Cao, Xi Chen, Jianghui Yu, Liu Guodong, Fangfu Xu, Qun Hu, Guangyan Li, Ying Zhu, Hongcheng Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhongtao MaJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Jiale CaoJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Xi ChenJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Jianghui YuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Liu GuodongJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Fangfu XuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Qun HuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Guangyan LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Ying ZhuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Hongcheng ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Haiyan WeiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light and nitrogen are crucial environmental factors that significantly impact rice growth and quality formation. Currently, there is a lack of systematic research on how light and nitrogen affect carbon and nitrogen metabolism during grain filling, subsequently affecting the eating quality of rice. To address this gap, field experiments were conducted under varying light intensities and nitrogen fertilizer levels to investigate the changes in carbon and nitrogen metabolism during grain filling, the eating quality of rice at maturity, and the relationship between them. The findings revealed that, 50% light intensity suppressed carbon metabolism while stimulating nitrogen metabolism, resulting in a reduction in the C/N ratio, decreased starch content by 4.30% to 5.59%, and elevated protein content by 21.31% to 29.70%, thereby leading to decreased rice eating quality by 10.06% to 11.42%. Conversely, the application of panicle fertilizer boosted nitrogen metabolism while hindering carbon metabolism, leading to a decrease in the C/N ratio, increased protein content by 21.31% to 29.70%, and reduced starch content by1.60% to 2.93%, thereby leading to decreased rice eating quality by 4.13% to 6.71%. Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between the C/N ratio and carbon metabolism-related enzyme activities and products, along with a significant negative correlation with nitrogen metabolism-related enzyme activities and products, suggesting that the C/N ratio can serve as an indicator of carbon and nitrogen metabolism levels. Further analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between the C/N ratio and taste value, indicating that higher levels of carbon metabolism promote the development of good rice eating quality, while nitrogen metabolism exerts an opposing influence. In summary, notable variances in carbon and nitrogen metabolism were observed within the same japonica rice cultivar under diverse light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions. These metabolic differences impact the synthesis of starch and protein in the endosperm, ultimately influencing rice quality. Our study contributes to a more profound comprehension of the regulation of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in rice by light and nitrogen fertilizer, as well as their role in determining eating quality.

Indexed as

carbon metabolism nitrogen metabolismC/Neating qualitylight intensitynitrogen fertilizersoft japonica rice

Identifiers

PMID39935948
PMCPMC11811539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.