Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935933›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Chest Radiography Scores for Predicting the Severity of Respiratory Status in Newborns Weighing More Than 1,500 g.

Kisho Asuka, Masashi Zuiki, Tomohiro Hasegawa, Rei Takada, Madoka Konishi, Akio Yamano, Eisuke Ichise, Kanae Hashigushi, Tatsuji Hasegawa, Tomoko Iehara

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kisho AsukaPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Masashi ZuikiPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Tomohiro HasegawaPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Rei TakadaPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Madoka KonishiPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Akio YamanoPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Eisuke IchisePediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Kanae HashigushiPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Tatsuji HasegawaPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.
Tomoko IeharaPediatrics and Neonatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Acute respiratory failure (ARF) may occur in neonates. Chest radiography is commonly used to evaluate the severity of ARF; however, the application of quantitative scales in clinical practice in neonatal intensive care units is uncommon. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of two semi-quantitative radiographical scales, the Brixia and radiographic assessment of lung edema (RALE) scores, in newborns weighing more than 1,500 g. Methods Newborns weighing > 1,500 g who received invasive respiratory support with arterial lines between January 2010 and October 2023 were enrolled in this study (n = 98; gestational age, 35.6 ± 3.1 weeks; birthweight, 2,321 ± 600 g). We investigated the correlation between the Brixia or RALE scores and the oxygen index (OI), alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-aDO

Indexed as

acute respiratory failure (arf)brixia scoreneonatal intensive care unitrale scorex-ray radiography

Identifiers

PMID39935933
PMCPMC11812488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.