ArticleCureus2025
Computed Tomography Scan of the Chest Is a Reliable Screening Investigation for Structural Cardiac and Pericardial Injury in Patients With Trauma.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest in detecting structural cardiac and pericardial injuries. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from a data registry at a trauma center between January 2015 and June 2022. This study included individuals with severe chest trauma (defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥3 for the chest). The assessment of cardiac injury from chest CT scans relied on the information provided in the official radiological reports. Definitive diagnoses of structural cardiac injury were confirmed on the basis of surgical findings or the diagnosis upon discharge. Results The chest CT scans revealed 11 cases of pericardial abnormalities: 10 (90.9%) cases of pericardial effusion in patients with blunt trauma and one (9.1%) case of pneumopericardium in a patient with a stab wound. Among these 11 cases, surgical exploration identified four structural cardiac and pericardial injuries, and three died during hospitalization. The remaining seven cases underwent nonsurgical intervention, and none exhibited any cardiac and pericardial abnormalities. The chest CT for traumatic structural cardiac and pericardial injuries had a sensitivity of 4/4 (100.0%), a specificity of 402/411 (97.8%), a positive predictive value of 4/11 (36.4%), and a negative predictive value of 404/404 (100.0%). Conclusion This study highlighted a high mortality rate among patients diagnosed with structural cardiac injuries, underscoring the critical importance of accurate and timely diagnostic investigations in such cases. Our findings confirmed that chest CT is a reliable screening tool for detecting structural cardiac injuries in patients with both blunt and penetrating chest trauma. However, given the relatively low positive predictive value of chest CT for structural cardiac injuries, additional diagnostic imaging or prompt surgical intervention may be necessary in cases where pericardial abnormalities are identified on chest CT to address potential occult cardiac injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.