ReviewCureus2025
Current Application and Future Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Medical Education: A Review of Literature.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT on Board-Style Examination Questions in Ophthalmology: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- A comparative benchmark of DeepSeek-R1 on the USMLE: surpassing human and AI performance averages.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Article
- Nurse Leadership and Artificial Intelligence Integration in Nursing Workforce Management: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Self-Ligating Brackets, Friction Reduction, Treatment Acceleration, and Patient-Centered Outcomes: A Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Expectations and concerns of primary healthcare patients in rural areas and small towns in Poland regarding artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bhutan's Response Against Increasing Number of Stroke (BRAINS): A Hybrid Type II Effectiveness-Implementation Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being used in every aspect of life today. It has found great application in the healthcare sector, with the use of this technology by medical schools all over the globe. AI has found multiple applications in medical fields such as diagnostics, medicine, surgery, oncology, radiology, ophthalmology, medical education, and numerous other medical fields. It has assisted in diagnosing conditions in a much quicker and more efficient manner, and the use of AI chatbots has greatly enhanced the learning process. Despite the benefits that AI applications provide, such as saving precious time for healthcare givers, there are also concerns regarding AI, mainly, ethical, and the fact that they might render the human race unemployed. However, despite these concerns, a lot of innovations are being made using AI applications, which show a very bright prospect for this technology. Although humans use AI in every part of their daily lives, they are also opposed to its use because they believe it could eventually replace them in the future. In this review of literature, a detailed analysis of the use of AI in the healthcare industry and medical education will be done, along with its shortcomings as well as its future prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.