Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935879›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Literacy among tobacco users and healthcare professionals about tobacco harm reduction strategies: a scoping review protocol.

Sajid Iqbal, Sudhanshu Patwardhan, Erika Sivarajan Froelicher, Kainat Asmat, Rubina Barolia

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sajid IqbalFaculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sudhanshu PatwardhanCentre for Health and Edcuation-UK and South Asia, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Erika Sivarajan FroelicherDepartment of Physiological Nursing, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Kainat AsmatFaculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Rubina BaroliaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The proposed review identifies and describes the extent of Tobacco Harm Reduction (THR) strategies in Pakistan. It also examines the awareness and understanding of these strategies among healthcare professionals and tobacco users in Pakistan. Introduction: Tobacco consumption poses a significant threat to human health and is a leading cause of non-communicable diseases. Over the last two decades, the prevalence of tobacco use has increased in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), which has considerably contributed to the increasing prevalence of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). Tobacco is consumed in various forms, including manufactured cigarettes, hookah/shisha, chewing tobacco, and dipping tobacco. Tobacco use can be reduced and prevented through various strategies adopted by many countries worldwide. One prominent strategy is THR. THR involves the use of safer nicotine products in recommended doses to cope with the symptoms of withdrawal and increase tobacco users' chances of quitting smoking. In Pakistan, the concept of tobacco harm reduction (THR) is not widely recognized by healthcare professionals and tobacco users. Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Literature available on Pakistani adults and adolescents (aged 13 years and above) will be included. Literature available as free full text will be included regardless of the publication date. Furthermore, literature available in English or Urdu will be considered eligible. Also, literature available in any form of publication, such as research studies, reviews, organizational websites or blogs, will be considered eligible. Literature that includes Pakistani data mixed with data from any other country will be excluded. Methods: The literature search will use PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest Theses & Dissertations, EBSCO Dentistry and Oral Sciences, and PsycInfo databases for online and gray literature. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram will record the included and excluded literature. Two independent reviewers will screen all the retrieved literature. After confirming the eligibility criteria, data from included records will be extracted on an Excel sheet that will record the important characteristics of the literature source and the main findings. Meta-synthesis of collated data will be performed, and the results will be presented as narrative summaries and frequency tables. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/dashboard.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionHealth LiteracyHealth PersonnelTobacco UseAdultHumansPakistanScoping Reviews as Topicelectronic cigarettesharm reductionharm reduction strategiesnicotinetobacco alternativestobacco harm reductiontobacco use

Identifiers

PMID39935879
PMCPMC11811536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.