ReviewIranian endodontic journal2025
Guided Endodontics for Non-surgical Root Canal Retreatment: A Systematic Review.
Review in Iranian endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Removal of Extraradicular Separated Instrument by Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery Using the 3D-Printed Guide and Trephine: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Nonsurgical Management of a Tooth With Intracanal Fiber Post and Periapical Lesion Using Guided Endodontic Technique.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Endodontic Surgery for Separated Instrument Removal: Success Rates and Techniques in a Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Dynamic Navigation in Endodontic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Guided Removal of Long and Short Fiber Posts Using Endodontic Static Guides: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Guided Endodontic Technique in Mandibular Incisors with Pulp Canal Obliteration: A Case Report.Iranian endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Guided Endodontic Management of Pulp Canal Obliteration in a Maxillary Canine with Root Resorption and Prior Iatrogenic Deviation: A Case Report.Iranian endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Guided Endodontic Treatment of an Upper Lateral Incisor: A Successful Outcome in the Presence of Procedural Errors-A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This systematic review compared the accuracy of guided endodontics with the conventional method in non-surgical endodontic retreatment. Methods: Two reviewers conducted a systematic search across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria consisted of all Results: Based on our criteria, seven studies were included in this review. The studies demonstrated variability in the techniques utilized. Iatrogenic errors were less frequent in guided groups, regardless of the operator's level of experience. Most studies indicated that guided endodontics was more effective than conventional methods, particularly in fiber post-removal and access through MTA, minimizing volumetric loss of tooth structure, and preserving fracture resistance. However, when using guided techniques for removal of separated instruments, more iatrogenic errors occurred, and more time was required compared to the freehand technique. Conclusion: Guided endodontics has shown promise in improving the outcomes of non-surgical retreatment by reducing complications. However, as all included studies were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.