ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Multi-scale channel attention U-Net: a novel framework for automated gallbladder segmentation in medical imaging.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a novel automatic delineation model, the Multi-Scale Channel Attention U-Net (MCAU-Net) model, for gallbladder segmentation on CT images of patients with liver cancer. Methods: We retrospectively collected the CT images from 120 patients with liver cancer, based on which ground truth was manually delineated by physicians. The images and ground truth constitute a dataset, which was proportionally divided into a training set (54%), a validation set (6%), and a test set (40%). Data augmentation was performed on the training set. Our proposed MCAU-Net model was employed for gallbladder segmentation and its performance was evaluated using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Sensitivity (SE), Hausdorff Distance (HD), Relative Volume Difference (RVD), and Volumetric Overlap Error (VOE) metrics. Results: On the test set, MCAU-Net achieved DSC, JSC, PPV, SE, HD, RVD, and VOE values of 0.85 ± 0.22, 0.79 ± 0.23, 0.92 ± 0.14, 0.84 ± 0.23, 2.75 ± 0.98, 0.18 ± 0.48, and 0.22 ± 0.42, respectively. Compared to the control models, U-Net, SEU-Net and TransUNet, the MCAU-Net improved DSC 0.06, 0.04 and 0.06, JSC by 0.09, 0.06 and 0.09, PPV by 0.08, 0.08 and 0.05, SE by 0.05,0.05 and 0.07, and reduced HD by 0.45, 0.28 and 0.41, RVD by 0.07, 0.03 and 0.07, VOE by 0.04, 0.02 and 0.08 respectively. Qualitative results revealed that MCAU-Net produced smoother and more accurate boundaries, closer to the expert delineation, with less over-segmentation and under-segmentation and improved robustness. Conclusions: The MCAU-Net model significantly improves gallbladder segmentation on CT images. It satisfies clinical requirements and enhances the efficiency of physicians, particularly in segmenting complex anatomical structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.