Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935809›Full record

ReviewGates open research2021

Child development with the D-score: turning milestones into measurement.

Stef van Buuren, Iris Eekhout

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gates open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of the PAM-13 instrument in the Hungarian general population 40 years old and above.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stef van BuurenNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, 2316 ZL, The Netherlands.
Iris EekhoutNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, 2316 ZL, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0030-1458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chapter equips the reader with a basic understanding of robust psychometric methods that are needed to turn developmental milestones into measurements, introducing the fundamental issues in defining a unit for child development and demonstrates the relevant quantitative methodology. It reviews quantitative approaches to measuring child development; introduces the Rasch model in a non-technical way; shows how to estimate model parameters from real data; puts forth a set of principles for model evaluation and assessment of scale quality; analyses the relation between early D-scores and later intelligence; and compares the D-scores from three studies that all use the same instrument.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentPsychometricsChildChild, PreschoolHumansIntelligencechild developmentchildren 0-2 yearsdevelopmental milestonesD-scoreD-score standard deviation score (DAZ)Dutch Development Instrument (Van Wiechenschema) measurementearly interventiongrowth chartitem difficultypretermRasch model

Identifiers

PMID39935809
PMCPMC11813173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.