ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Three-Month Outcomes of SMILE Pro with the VISUMAX 800 for Myopic Astigmatism in a Large Population.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel method for evaluating the thickness and keratometry profiles of toric lenticules created by a new-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction platform.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Refractive and Vector Outcomes of SMILE Pro with the VISUMAX 800 for High Astigmatism.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of the new generation VISUMAX 800 platform in small incision lenticule extraction for Myopia in Chinese patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Safety and Postoperative Complications After SMILE Pro: A Retrospective Case Series of 916 Eyes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Three-Month Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism Using the VISUMAX 800 in 1611 Eyes.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Vector outcomes after SMILE pro with the VISUMAX 800 for high versus moderate-to-low astigmatism: a contralateral eye comparison.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Postoperative Contrast Sensitivity and Its Association with Lenticule Surface Regularity After KLEx with the VisuMax 800.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Enhanced predictability and axis precision of SMILE Pro, a retrospective analysis of myopic astigmatism correction.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparing The Existing Myopic Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) Platforms: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report the visual and refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) Pro using a 2 MHz femtosecond laser for myopic astigmatism in a large population of Vietnamese patients. Methods: This was a retrospective clinical study of subjects that underwent keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) with the VISUMAX 800 at Hong Son Eye Hospital (Ha Noi, Vietnam) between June 2023 and October 2023. Primary outcome measures of monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and refraction, including vector analysis, were evaluated at 3-months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures of intraoperative and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: A total of 765 eyes from 389 patients (60.66% women, mean age of 23.54±5.20 years) were analyzed 3 months after surgery. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -5.98±2.26 D. The postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was within ±0.50 D of the intended target in 81% and within ±1.00 D in 97% of eyes. The mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.11±0.45 D. UDVA was 20/25 or better in 92% and 20/32 or better in 97% of eyes. The mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA values were 0.05±0.09 and 0.00±0.02 logMAR, respectively. There was no change in CDVA in 99% of eyes. Efficacy index was 0.92, and safety index was 1.00. One eye (0.13%) had a suction loss, which resulted in a lenticule remnant. No other complications were reported during surgery or the postoperative follow-up period. Conclusion: The current study, carried out on a large cohort of Asian patients, showed SMILE Pro with the VISUMAX 800 was safe and effective for treating myopic astigmatism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.