ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Exploring Available Plastic Surgery Reward Programs and Proposing a Modeled Approach.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a paucity of literature exploring private practice reward programs within plastic and aesthetic surgery. In this study, the authors explore private practice websites and identify universal commercial programs and practice-specific programs being adopted. They aim to evaluate the current landscape of private practice reward programs by examining their advantages and limitations. Additionally, they propose an "ideal" loyalty program that could enhance patient engagement, satisfaction, and practice growth. A review was performed to identify available reward programs and models. Private practice websites were examined for available reward models. Commercial loyalty programs were cross-referenced to determine practices leveraging them. Data collected included private practice reward program type, region, and total surgeons at the practice. Advantages and areas of improvement were analyzed of existing programs and discussions with private practice surgeons generated proposals of an ideal loyalty program model. There were no articles on plastic surgery reward programs. Private practice websites suggested 3 universal reward systems, including Allē (Allergan, Inc., Dublin, Ireland), Aspire (Galderma, Lausanne, Switzerland), and Evolus (Newport Beach, CA). A total of 4 private practices with custom reward programs were identified. Universal reward systems are point-based and often lack excitement for the consumer. These benefits accumulate points across different providers, but often lack practice-specific reward opportunities. Although beneficial, most commercially available loyalty programs do not integrate into electronic medical records (EMRs) to track usage and challenges exist in tracking patient utilization. The ideal platform harmonizes the advantages of commercial loyalty programs with tailored practice-specific rewards while having the capacity to integrate with the EMR and capture patient utilization. Level of Evidence 5 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.