Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935758›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2024

Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumours: complications based on own material.

Wojciech Krajewski, Maciej Guziński, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Wojciech Tomczak, Adam Chełmoński, Katarzyna Grunwald, Łukasz Nowak, Joanna Chorbińska, Francesco Del Giudice, Bartosz Małkiewicz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Maciej GuzińskiDepartment of General, Interventional and Neuroradiology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Jan ŁaszkiewiczUniversity Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Wojciech TomczakUniversity Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Adam ChełmońskiUniversity Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Katarzyna GrunwaldUniversity Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Łukasz NowakDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Joanna ChorbińskaDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Bartosz MałkiewiczDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Tomasz SzydełkoUniversity Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the primary treatment for T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Also, percutaneous cryoablation is gaining attention as a curative option in appropriately selected patients. However, even mini-mally invasive procedures are not free from toxicity. The objective of this study was to assess the safety profile of the percutaneous renal cryoablation (PCA) procedure during the learning curve of the first 75 cases. Material and methods: All procedures were performed by urologists with vast experience in ultrasonography (USG)-guided percutaneous renal procedures and interventional radiologists skilled in computed tomography (CT) interventions. The cryoprobes were inserted percutaneously under hybrid USG/intermittent CT guidance. Complications that took place in the first 4 weeks after the procedure, both during hospitalisation and after discharge, were evaluated. Results: The study included 68 patients with 75 tumours treated with PCA in our centre. The patients were old (mean 72 years), overweight (mean BMI 29.1) and severely comorbid (aver-age Charlson comorbidity index 5.9; ASA score 2.8). Pain during the surgery was reported by 21.3% of the patients. Five (6.7%) perirenal haematomas > 4 cm developed immediately after the surgery. The most common postoperative ailments included: ma-laise (20.0%), pain (16.0%), nausea and vomiting (8.0%) and haematuria (6.7%). Other complications occurred in less than 5% of the cases. Nonetheless, no blood transfusions were neces-sary and only one patient required a minor surgical intervention. Conclusions: According to this study, PCA is a safe procedure with a very low risk of major complications.

Indexed as

complicationspercutaneous cryoablationRCCrenal cell carcinomarenal tumourthermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID39935758
PMCPMC11809564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.