ArticleClinical kidney journal2025
Sharing regional capacity in deceased donor kidney transplantation: experience from a regional collaborative in a metropolitan area.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Access to deceased donor kidney transplantation may be restricted in the event of resource limitation induced by extreme peaks in activity or local major incidents, which exceed centre capacity. An organ-sharing protocol was developed by the five London transplant units in 2019 to establish a system for safe transfer of organs and recipients between five regional kidney transplant units. We describe the activity and outcomes over the initial 20-month period. Methods: National data on kidney transplants performed via the collaborative scheme were obtained from National Health Service Blood and Transplant. Outcomes data was collected locally and analysed. Results: Sixteen recipients were transplanted between November 2020 and July 2022. The reasons for referral were theatre capacity and an information technology systems failure. Donor kidneys were from 10 brainstem death donors (62.5%) and six circulatory death donors (37.5%). Half of the donors fulfilled standard criteria. Twelve patients (75%) were first transplant recipients. Three (18.75%) were highly sensitized (calculated reaction frequency ≥85%). Three (18.75%) patients required arterial reconstruction. Seven patients (43.75%) had delayed graft function. Median creatinine at 12 months post-transplantation was 134 µmol/L. The median length of stay was 7.5 days. Three recipients (18.75%) died within the first year, two from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions: This unique organ sharing collaborative scheme involving five hospitals in London enabled 16 transplants to proceed which otherwise would not have occurred. Although initially established for low-risk donors and recipients, the scheme has evolved to enable transplantation for a wide variety of recipients of varying complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.