Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935734›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025

Cultural adaptation process of six stigma assessment scales among Kannada speaking population in South India.

Harshitha H Annajigowda, Gurucharan Bhaskar Mendon, Anish V Cherian, Syed Shabab Wahid, Brandon A Kohrt, Nicolas Rüesch, Sara Evans-Lacko, Elaine Brohan, Claire Henderson, Graham Thornicroft and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Harshitha H AnnajigowdaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-9629
Gurucharan Bhaskar MendonDepartment of Psychiatry Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0712-8547
Anish V CherianDepartment of Psychiatry Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Syed Shabab WahidDepartment of Global Health, School of Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-0537
Brandon A KohrtCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3829-4820
Nicolas RüeschDepartment of Psychiatry II, Ulm University and BKH Günzburg, Germany.
Sara Evans-LackoHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-2630
Elaine BrohanCentre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Claire HendersonPublic Mental Health, Health Services and Population Research Department P029, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London , UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6998-5659
Graham ThornicroftCentre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Santosh LoganathanDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.

Funding

RESHAPE Diversity SupplementR01MH120649 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOHRT, BRANDON ALAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For several years stigma researchers in India have relied on Western instruments or semi-structured stigma scales in their studies. However, these scales have not been rigorously translated and adapted to the local cultural framework. In the current study, we describe the cultural adaptation of six stigma scales with the purpose of using it in the native language (Kannada) based on translation steps of forward translation, expert review and synthesis, cultural equivalence, back translation and cognitive interview processes. Several items were modified in the target language at each stage of the cultural adaptation process as mentioned in the above steps across all scales. Cultural explanations for the same have been provided. Concepts such as "community forest" and "baby sitting" was replaced with equivalent native synonyms. We introduced native cultural and family values such as "joint family system" and modified the item of housing concept in one of the tools. The concept of "privacy" in the Indian rural context was observed to be familial than individual-based and modification of corresponding items according to the native context of "privacy". Finally, items from each scale were modified but retained without affecting the meaning and the core construct.

Indexed as

AdaptationAssessment toolsCross-culturalDiscriminationMental illness

Identifiers

PMID39935734
PMCPMC11810757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.