Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935678›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2025

Extended fiducial inference: toward an automated process of statistical inference.

Faming Liang, Sehwan Kim, Yan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Faming LiangDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Sehwan KimDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Yan SunDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

An Imputation-Consistency Algorithm for Biomedical Complex Data AnalysisR01GM126089 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LIANG, FAMING · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
Stochastic Deep Learning for Electronic Health Records: Localizing Learning with Massive and Fragmented DataR01GM152717 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LIANG, FAMING, WANG, XIAOFENG · 2023 to 2025
$600k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126089NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM152717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While fiducial inference was widely considered a big blunder by R.A. Fisher, the goal he initially set-'inferring the uncertainty of model parameters on the basis of observations'-has been continually pursued by many statisticians. To this end, we develop a new statistical inference method called extended Fiducial inference (EFI). The new method achieves the goal of fiducial inference by leveraging advanced statistical computing techniques while remaining scalable for big data. Extended Fiducial inference involves jointly imputing random errors realized in observations using stochastic gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo and estimating the inverse function using a sparse deep neural network (DNN). The consistency of the sparse DNN estimator ensures that the uncertainty embedded in observations is properly propagated to model parameters through the estimated inverse function, thereby validating downstream statistical inference. Compared to frequentist and Bayesian methods, EFI offers significant advantages in parameter estimation and hypothesis testing. Specifically, EFI provides higher fidelity in parameter estimation, especially when outliers are present in the observations; and eliminates the need for theoretical reference distributions in hypothesis testing, thereby automating the statistical inference process. Extended Fiducial inference also provides an innovative framework for semisupervised learning.

Indexed as

complex hypothesis testMarkov chain Monte Carlosemisupervised learningsparse deep learninguncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID39935678
PMCPMC11809222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.