Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935653›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2025

Stent Crumpling as a Complication of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, a Case Report and Literature Review.

Maryam Mehrpooya, Hamed Vahidi, Maryam Taheri, Pouya Ebrahimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maryam MehrpooyaDepartment of Cardiology Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-963X
Hamed VahidiDepartment of Cardiology Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-515X
Maryam TaheriTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Disease Research Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4615-9380
Pouya EbrahimiTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Disease Research Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3694-6863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stent crumpling is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This report highlights a case of stent crumpling during a PCI procedure, its management, and the importance of advanced imaging techniques in diagnosing and addressing such complications. A 78-year-old man was admitted for elective PCI on the left anterior descending (LAD) artery following an acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with thrombolytic therapy. The patient exhibited significant ischemic changes on his electrocardiogram (ECG) and experienced persistent angina. During the PCI, two overlapping stents were deployed in the LAD. Post-dilation led to slow flow and thrombus formation in the LAD, rapidly progressing to cardiac arrest. Immediate resuscitation and intracoronary thrombolytic therapy were initiated. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) revealed stent crumpling, so the proximal stent folded within the vessel lumen. To solve this issue, the crumpled stent was crushed behind a newly deployed stent, followed by post-dilation, which restored TIMI flow grade III in the LAD.

Indexed as

case reportinterventional cardiologymyocardial infarction (MI)percutaneous interventions (PCI)stent failure

Identifiers

PMID39935653
PMCPMC11810625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.