Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935619›Full record

ReviewIntegrative medicine research2025

Patient-Focused Drug Development and Real World Study.

Haiyin Hu, Hui Wang, Lin Ang, Menglong Shi, Xiaolei Wu, Chenyao Zhang, Mei Han, Shigang Liu, Kai Li, Junhua Zhang and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haiyin HuEvidence Base Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China.
Hui WangEvidence Base Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China.
Lin AngKM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Menglong ShiEvidence Base Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China.
Xiaolei WuEvidence Base Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China.
Chenyao ZhangEvidence Base Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China.
Mei HanEvidence Base Medicine Center, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, PR China.
Shigang LiuGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, PR China.
Kai LiShanxi Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of classical prescription strengthening yang), Shanxi, PR China.
Junhua ZhangEvidence Base Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China.
Zhaochen JiEvidence Base Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient-focused drug development (PFDD) is an important direction in the field of medical research and is of great significance to the development of medicine. In recent years, PFDD and real-world study (RWS) have gained much interest, of which both have their advantages. This study aims to promote research methods innovation and optimize clinical research design and implementation. Methods: After a brief introduction of PFDD and RWS, this review focused on the comparison of clinical trials of PFDD and RWS in terms of objectives, Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) elements, research team members, data acquisition, and research key points, and clarified the feasibility and significance of "patient-focused RWS" research model. Results: PFDD emphasized that patients' needs as well as the willingness and satisfaction of patients should be considered throughout the whole research process and the patient experience data should be collected during the study development and drug use. RWS emphasized the facticity of research implementation environment and the breadth of patient sources, which concerned the problem of the extrapolation of study results, the clinical localization, and patient applicability of the target drug. However, there is a connection between both of the above. Both clinical trials of PFDD and RWS bring benefits to patients. Conclusions: Combining PFDD idea and RWS research method to carry out new research will maximize the benefits for patients. The study model combining the PFDD concept with RWS can facilitate drug development and dissemination, which can be popularized and applied in various research areas. This study can innovate research methods and provide new ideas for future research.

Indexed as

Patient demandPatient-focused drug developmentReal-world studyResearch method

Identifiers

PMID39935619
PMCPMC11810706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.