ArticleACS electrochemistry2025
Droplet-Confined Electroplating for Nanoscale Additive Manufacturing: Current Control of the Initial Stages of Growth of Copper Nanowires.
Article in ACS electrochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Imaging: Localized Synthesis, Fabrication, and Surface Modification via Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Nanodroplet-Confined Electroplating Enables Submicron Printing of Metals and Oxide Ceramics.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Optimizing Electrochemical Microprinting of Conducting Polymers: Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy (SECCM) Coupled with Conveyor-Belt Surface Analysis.Small methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Droplet-confined electrodeposition enables a precise deposition of three-dimensional, nanoscopic, and high purity metal structures. It aspires to fabricate intricate microelectronic devices, metamaterials, plasmonic structures, and functionalized surfaces. Yet, a major handicap of droplet-confined electrodeposition is the current lack of control over the process, which is owed to its dynamic nature and the nanoscopic size of the involved droplets. The deposition current offers itself as an obvious and real-time window into the deposition and needs to be analyzed operando. Nucleation and growth dynamics are evaluated systematically. Our results indicate different deposition regimes and link the current to both morphology and volume of deposited copper. This allows for optimized electroplating strategies and calibration of the slicing algorithms necessary for a controlled deposition of 3D structures with different solvents. The potential of selecting appropriate solvents further readies this novel technique for the reliable deposition of functional structures with submicron resolution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.