ArticleWearable technologies2025
A feasibility study on using soft insoles for estimating 3D ground reaction forces with incorporated 3D-printed foam-like sensors.
Article in Wearable technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the biomechanics of lower limbs in normal, overweight, and obese people using the SMART F-IMU system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility and usability of a wearable sensor system for gait assessment in children with neuromuscular diseases.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensorized insoles provide a tool for gait studies and health monitoring during daily life. For users to accept such insoles, they need to be comfortable and lightweight. Previous research has demonstrated that sensorized insoles can estimate ground reaction forces (GRFs). However, these insoles often assemble commercial components restricting design freedom and customization. Within this work, we incorporated four 3D-printed soft foam-like sensors to sensorize an insole. To test the insoles, we had nine participants walk on an instrumented treadmill. The four sensors behaved in line with the expected change in pressure distribution during the gait cycle. A subset of this data was used to identify personalized Hammerstein-Wiener (HW) models to estimate the 3D GRFs while the others were used for validation. In addition, the identified HW models showed the best estimation performance (on average root mean squared (RMS) error 9.3%, =0.85 and mean absolute error (MAE) 7%) of the vertical, mediolateral, and anteroposterior GRFs, thereby showing that these sensors can estimate the resulting 3D force reasonably well. These results were comparable to or outperformed other works that used commercial force-sensing resistors with machine learning. Four participants participated in three trials over a week, which showed a decrease in estimation performance over time but stayed on average 11.35% RMS and 8.6% MAE after a week with the performance seeming consistent between days two and seven. These results show promise for using 3D-printed soft piezoresistive foam-like sensors with system identification regarding the viability for applications that require softness, lightweight, and customization such as wearable (force) sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.