ArticleClinical and translational imaging2024
Epichaperome-targeted myocardial imaging by
Article in Clinical and translational imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo imaging of heat shock protein 90: Diagnostic tool and support for Hsp90-targeted therapy.Cell stress & chaperones · 2025Review
- PU-H71 (NSC 750424): a molecular masterpiece that targets HSP90 in cancer and beyond.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The small molecule radiotracer Purpose: To describe human Methods: 25 cancer patients (age 22-75 years, M:F - 7:18) with no history of cardiovascular disease received intravenous injections with microdose Results: Myocardial accumulation of Conclusion: Our study finds human myocardial epichaperome expression, as quantified by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.