ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Evaluation of dietary acid-binding capacity level on nursery pig growth performance and fecal dry matter.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of dietary acidifiers and other low acid-binding capacity formulation strategies on weanling pig growth performance and fecal dry matter.Translational animal science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate dietary acid-binding capacity-4 (ABC-4) level on weanling pig performance and fecal dry matter (DM). In both experiments, there were five pigs per pen and 12 replications per dietary treatment fed in two phases. In Exp. 1, 360 barrows, initially 5.9 kg, were allotted to one of six treatments. Five treatments were formulated with increasing ABC-4 ranging from 150 (low ABC-4) to 312 meq/kg (high ABC-4) in phase 1 and 200 (low ABC-4) to 343 meq/kg (high ABC-4) in phase 2. The low ABC-4 diet was formulated with specialty soy protein concentrate (SSPC; AX3 Digest, Protekta, Newport Beach, CA) and a combination of dietary acidifiers. Increasing ABC-4 was achieved by progressively replacing SSPC with enzymatically treated soybean meal (ESBM; HP 300, Hamlet Protein, Findlay, OH) on a standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys basis and decreasing acidifiers. Diets were formulated to contain 100 mg/kg of Zn. For the sixth treatment, pharmacological levels of Zn from ZnO were added to the high ABC-4 diet. From day 0 to 23 and day 0 to 38, increasing ABC-4 increased then decreased (quadratic, P ≤ 0.046) ADG and ADFI. On days 10 and 17, increasing ABC-4 decreased (linear, P ≤ 0.022) fecal DM. From day 0 to 23, pigs fed the diet containing ZnO had increased (P ≤ 0.009) BW, ADG and ADFI compared to the high ABC-4 diet without ZnO. In Exp 2, 300 pigs, initially 6.0 kg, were allotted to one of five dietary treatments. Diet 1 was a low ABC-4 diet formulated to 200 and 250 meq/kg in phases 1 and 2, respectively. Two intermediate ABC-4 levels were formulated by either replacing SSPC with ESBM on a SID Lys basis (diet 2) or removing acidifiers (diet 3). Diet 4 was a high ABC-4 diet formulated by replacing SSPC and removing acidifiers to increase ABC-4. Diet 5 was diet 4 but with pharmacological levels of Zn from ZnO. Diets 1 through 4 contained 110 mg/kg of Zn. From day 0 to 24 and day 0 to 38, increasing ABC-4 decreased (linear, P ≤ 0.046) G:F. On days 10 and 24, increasing ABC-4 decreased (linear, P ≤ 0.005) fecal DM. From day 0 to 24, pigs fed the diet containing ZnO had increased (P ≤ 0.047) BW, ADG, ADFI, and G:F compared to the high ABC-4 diet without ZnO. In conclusion, an ABC-4 of 200 meq/kg from day 0 to 10 postweaning and 250 meq/kg from day 10 to 24 postweaning improves pig growth performance and fecal DM for compared to higher ABC-4 diets. In diets without ZnO, low ABC-4 diet formulation can improve the performance and fecal DM of weanling pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.