ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Head Motion in Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Quantification, Mitigation, and Structural Associations in Large, Cross-Sectional Datasets Across the Lifespan.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Highly replicable multisite patterns of adolescent white matter maturation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Head motion during diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can cause numerous artifacts and biases subsequent quantification. However, a thorough characterization of motion across multiple scans, cohorts, and consortiums has not been performed. To address this, we designed a study with three aims. First, we aimed to characterize subject motion across several large cohorts, utilizing 13 cohorts comprised of 16,995 imaging sessions (age 0.1-100 years, mean age = 63 years; 7220 females; 3175 cognitively impaired adults; 471 developmentally delayed children) to describe the magnitude and directions of subject movement. Second, we aimed to investigate whether state-of-the-art diffusion preprocessing pipelines mitigate biases in quantitative measures of microstructure and connectivity by taking advantage of datasets with scan-rescan acquisitions and ask whether there are detectable differences between the same subjects when scans and rescans have differing levels of motion. Third, we aimed to investigate whether there are structural connectivity differences between movers and non-movers. We found that (1) subjects typically move 1-2 mm/min with most motion as translation in the anterior-posterior direction and rotation around the right-left axis; (2) Modern preprocessing pipelines can effectively mitigate motion to the point where biases are not detectable with current analysis techniques; and (3) There are no apparent differences in microstructure or macrostructural connections in participants who exhibit high motion versus those that exhibit low motion. Overall, characterizing motion magnitude and directions, as well as motion correlates, informs and improves motion mitigation strategies and image processing pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.