ArticleMedical physics2025
Automatic bone marrow segmentation for precise [
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic lesion segmentation in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT and ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT: added value of PET-guided SPECT in a bicentric study.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Inter-center variability of dosimetry methodology and the impact on reported absorbed dose for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- An international study of factors affecting variability of dosimetry calculations, part 5: impact of segmentation methods.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- The role of multimodality imaging in selection, response assessment, and follow-up of patients receivingInsights into imaging · 2026Article
- Towards practical radiopharmaceutical treatment planning: a review of dosimetry simplification techniques.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Article
- Automatic bone marrow segmentation for precise [Medical physics · 2025Article
- AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBone marrow (BM) is the dominant dose-limiting organ in [ PURPOSE: We aim to develop an automatic image-based segmentation method on peri-therapeutic sequential [
methodsQuantitative SPECT/CT imaging at 2, 20, 40 and 60 (n = 14)/200 (n = 16) h post [
resultsIn 30 cycles of 10 patients, the average Dice is 0.76 ± 0.18 for the X-means clustering method, as compared to 0.61 ± 0.19 for the single threshold method. The gold standard yields mean BM D
conclusionsX-means clustering is feasible to segment the BM based on the CT images of peri-therapy SPECT/CT and shows advantages compared with the single threshold and empirical sphere segmentation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.