Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935251›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2025

Locomotor Response to Novelty: What Does It Tell Us?

Erin K Kirschmann, Tracy T Smith, Jenna N Shold, Eric C Donny, Alan F Sved, Edda Thiels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Premature release of action sequences in adolescent male rats.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erin K KirschmannDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8971-7897
Tracy T SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jenna N SholdCenter for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eric C DonnyCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alan F SvedCenter for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Edda ThielsDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Training Program in the Neurobiology of Substance Use and AbuseT32DA031111 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FORBES, ERIKA E, GRACE, ANTHONY A · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS 1T32DA031111-01[EKK]andDA027679[ET])NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in response strategies may be utilized to identify those at risk for the development of neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety, and substance use. One behavioral attribute that has been used to predict later mood disorders and substance use disorders is an organism's predisposition for novelty-seeking, modeled in rodents as increased exploration of novel environments or stimuli. Despite documented correlations of locomotor response to a novel environment and disease-specific tendencies, it remains unclear whether the "response to novelty trait" is stable across time and environments. Adolescence is an important transitional time, associated with vulnerability for neuropsychiatric disorders. Only a few studies have assessed whether variations in novelty-seeking behaviors in adolescent animals translate to variations of susceptibility to neuropsychiatric disorders later in life, and it is unclear whether initial locomotor responses to novelty are stable across time and development. We examined whether locomotor response to a novel environment is a stable attribute across time in a series of Open Field tests in early adolescent (postnatal day [p] 23-25) late adolescent (p58-59) and adult (p72 and older) male Sprague-Dawley rats. We also examined the relation between the locomotor response to a novel environment and other measures of responding to novelty. Results suggest that locomotor response to a novel environment does not emerge as a stable behavioral attribute until late adolescence. They also suggest that locomotor response to a novel environment and novelty-seeking, as assessed with the Novelty Place Preference paradigm, capture nonoverlapping behavioral tendencies.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalExploratory BehaviorLocomotionAnimalsMaleRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyadolescentearly experiencehabituationlocomotionrodent

Identifiers

PMID39935251
PMCPMC11814917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.