SynthesisBrain and behavior2025
Ethical Concerns of AI in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in peripheral neurosurgery: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- AI-integrated smartwatch monitoring for early detection of stroke and hemorrhage: A systematic review.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- THINKERS-X: multisequence MRI radiomics in a mixture-of-experts model for outcome prediction and exploratory dose-scenario evaluation in lung cancer brain metastases treated with radiosurgery.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026Article
- A call for dynamic guidelines: Incorporating AI ethics into social media best practices for spine professionals.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurosurgical decision-making: promise and peril in the United States practice.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Neuroethics and Neurorights.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- A narrative review on artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: ethical challenges and implementation considerations.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The evolution of intracranial aneurysm clipping: a historical perspective.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relentless integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into neurosurgery necessitates a meticulous exploration of the associated ethical concerns. This systematic review focuses on synthesizing empirical studies, reviews, and opinion pieces from the past decade, offering a nuanced understanding of the evolving intersection between AI and neurosurgical ethics. MATERIALS AND
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted to identify studies addressing AI in neurosurgery, emphasizing ethical dimensions. The search strategy employed keywords related to AI, neurosurgery, and ethics. Inclusion criteria encompassed empirical studies, reviews, and ethical analyses published in the last decade, with English language restriction. Quality assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute tools ensured methodological rigor.
resultsEight key studies were identified, each contributing unique insights to the ethical considerations associated with AI in neurosurgery. Findings highlighted limitations of AI technologies, challenges in data bias, transparency, and legal responsibilities. The studies emphasized the need for responsible AI systems, regulatory oversight, and transparent decision-making in neurosurgical practices.
conclusionsThe synthesis of findings underscores the complexity of ethical considerations in the integration of AI in neurosurgery. Transparent and responsible AI use, regulatory oversight, and mitigation of biases emerged as recurring themes. The review calls for the establishment of comprehensive ethical guidelines to ensure safe and equitable AI integration into neurosurgical practices. Ongoing research, educational initiatives, and a culture of responsible innovation are crucial for navigating the evolving landscape of AI-driven advancements in neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.